I'm not a crack Pot... Academics and Doctors who Question the Narrative

Fox with raised arms

Danger! This site may spread misinformation and even encourage conspiracy theorist tendencies. …..I have to say, normally people find me calm and collected, but I am getting more and more fired up and fucked off when people say that anyone who questions the narrative is a conspiracy theorist. In relation to covid, smug journalists imply that fearful and deranged individuals, not to mention foxes such as me, are falling for fake news and propaganda and they don’t know how to read the science. They imply that we are acting from a place of fear, huddling together with Tin-Hat theories in a kind of anti-covid cult, clinging to any theory that negates covid’s existence. Well actually hundreds of academics, doctors, lawyers and well-respected thinkers are questioning the covid narrative. In this article we highlight some of their views. These professionals do not all think the same as each other but they do all offer fresh and challenging viewpoints.

Suppression of Science and Fear Mongering

Virus fraud word puzzle

The respected British Medical Journal recently wrote an editorial ‘Covid-19—politicisation, ‘corruption’, and suppression of Science’. There were many responses to this article including from Theodore F. Schrecker, Prof. of Global Health Policy , Newcastle University who said:

The result of the lack of accountability mechanism is that people die not only from Covid-19 but also from other conditions as diagnosis and treatment have been disrupted by shambolic responses to the pandemic.

The final words of this Professor on the issue of suppression of science is that we must “mourn and resist"

Leemon McHenry PhD is a bioethicist and Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at California State University, Northridge, in the United States. His expertise is suppression of science by pharma industry, he says in an interview:

The pharmaceutical industry is manufacturing all these journal articles behind the scenes for basically marketing purposes. I was astounded because I had this enormous trust in medical journals. What has happened in something like the past 20 or 30 years especially with Blockbuster drugs, is that we are sold a lot of pharmaceuticals where the risk-benefit ratio is not in favour of taking the drug….. We need to completely eliminate the pharmaceutical industry testing its own drugs.

Dr Eshani M. King of Evidence Based Research in Immunology and Health pointed out in a letter to the British Medical Journal

Suppression of science and lack of open debate has impinged enormously on three issues of fundamental significance. Firstly, public fear of Covid has been elevated to levels that are completely out of proportion to the actual danger.

Helga Rhein, a retired doctor wrote to the British Medical Journal on the suppression of alternative treatments for covid. Why have easy treatments such as vitamin D not been part of the government’s response?

One example of suppression of science is the well documented fact of significant vitamin D deficiency in the UK and other countries and its link to the health of a well functioning immune system. Several group of physicians have now called for higher vitamin D supplements in this pandemic, which should be read and assessed by chief medical officers and public health specialists….

Dr Andrew Banji, Retired Consultant Rheumatologist says in a letter to the British Medical Journal:

Counter-narrative from an informed individual or an academic department, has been seriously ignored. Dissenters have been quite efficiently no-platformed.

Scientists Who Speak out Against PCR Tests

The fear of covid has been fed with talk in the mainstream media about rises in covid cases, always cases, cases, cases! These cases were identified by testing people with and without symptoms using the PCR test. Even people who were perfectly healthy were encouraged to get tested. But normal, sane scientists have criticized the PCR test for its appropriateness, sensitivity and problems such as false positives and poor testing conditions. Dr Pascal Sacré is a physician specializing in critical care, author and public health analyst. He states in a well referenced article:

This over-sensitivity of the RT-PCR test is deleterious and misleading! It detaches us from the medical reality which must remain based on the real clinical state of the person: is the person ill, does he or she have symptoms? That is the most important thing!

The most experienced PCR scientist in the UK, Dr Julian Harris recently blew the whistle on the issue of mistakes with PCR tests due to poorly trained staff and poor lab conditions. He said fellow workers had limited laboratory experience and were not given proper safety induction.

"I found they've got no experience with this sort of facility or handling bio-hazardous, and then they're just launched into this facility,"

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is a German Microbiologist and doctor with over three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate. He says in a video interview:

I think that the pandemic is a fake. It was based on a PCR test that was highly fallible, dangerously inaccurate, giving false positive data that was unfortunately taken as the main diagnostic criterium.

You can watch the excellent video of Dr. Sucharit explaining his grave concerns about the coronavirus narrative. Please do ask yourself if he sounds like a crackpot or a very concerned, professional family man who has seen the cracks in the covid story.

Dr Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who has spent over 30 years leading new medicines research writes about the problem of false positives in his piece, “Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics” :

The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 per cent, or near certainty.

Other scientists have given different false positive rates depending on the sensitivity of the test and you can read more discussion here.

Danish academic Niels H. Harrit, PhD, former Associate Professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen urges for PCR testing to be stopped in this article:

To be sick is to have symptoms. If you are not sick, you are not contagious. It used to be common sense that you are healthy unless you are not. Sense is not common anymore during the alleged Covid-19 pandemic Now you are sick until proven healthy – and contagious by default. The vehicle for this scam is the RT-PCR test run at >35 cycles and beyond. Stop testing and survive.

Other scientists who strongly cricitize PCR tests include:

Dr. David Rasnick, PhD in chemistry, BS degrees in biology and chemistry, and over 4 decades of experience.

Dr Clair Craig, Consultant Pathologist since 2009

Dr Daniel Jeanmonod, Chief Medical Officer, Swizerland

Tom Jefferson, Carl Heneghan, Elizabeth Spencer, Jon Brassey , all doctors from Oxford University

Covid Vaccines

Many top-level researchers and scientists believe the covid vaccines may not be fit for purpose. Here are some of their views:

Leemon McHenry PhD, a bioethicist and expert on medical ethics who studied transparency of the pharma industry says:

I am terribly worried about this, for people who are taking this vaccine right now who are at the front lines because it has been rushed to market so quickly that it is alarming. Under a global pandemic what we have got is a situation where it is extremely difficult for the top scientists around the world to follow the science…what kind of trust and confidence will we put in this?

Dr Mike Yeadon wrote:

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing.

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus.

"In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized."

Dr Charles Hoffe BSc, MB, BCh, LMCC from Lytton, Canada stated in an open letter and also on video:

It is now clearly apparent with medical evidence from around the world, that the side-effect profiles of the various gene modification therapies against Covid-19, have been vastly understated by their manufacturers, who were eager to prove their safety.

Meanwhile, Geert Vanden Bossche, Ph.D, a vaccinology insider and former global director of vaccine programs, including work for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has called for the mass vaccination campaign against COVID-19 to end in a recent video interview.

Oxford University professor Sunetra Gupta, an epidemiologist, has been tagged ‘Professor Reopen’ for her argument against lockdowns as a countermeasure against the Covid-19 pandemic. In a conversation with Hindustan Times, Professor Gupta explained why most people won’t need a Covid-19 vaccine:

It is now clearly apparent with medical evidence from around the world, that the side-effect profiles of the various gene modification therapies against Covid-19, have been vastly understated by their manufacturers, who were eager to prove their safety.

Other scientists who warn against the covid vaccines are listed below, with hyperlinks to further information:

Do please get out your Bullshit Detector. Check out these scientists online. Remember that because they DO question the narrative they are likely to have been disgraced or slandered for their viewpoints, and labelled as having political or financial motives. So please read beyond the Fact Checkers and Wikepedia, and look at their life’s work before you throw them away as nut jobs.

Questioning the Need for Lockdowns

The most well-known example of top-level scientists protesting against strict lockdowns is the Great Barrington Declaration. The Great Barrington Declaration under which thousands of scientists and medical practitioners have called for an end to lockdown policies, was drawn up last October 1st-4th, was announced on October 5th, and was already being denounced on October 6th. Over the next month, the GBD and its message were virtually buried beneath an “avalanche of scathing criticism condemning it as ‘very dangerous, unscientific, unethical, total nonsense, dangerously flawed, conspiratorial and grotesque’.

Among the critics were prominent role-players such as World Health Organization director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, British chief scientific adviser Patrick Vallance, and US infectious diseases expert Anthony Fauci. You can read more about this declaration which aims to create a situation where the most vulnerable are protected whilst everyone else gets on with life in this analysis.

But what stands out to use is the amount of doctors who signed this agreement. You can view the very long list of doctors’ signatories here and you can see a map of the signatories below:

great barrington map

There is no doubt that there are many sides to the covid debate. I personally believe that the most important objective to focus on is retaining our physical, emotional and spiritual health, whilst living a full and wondrous human existence. We need to watch out for fear on both sides, which doesn’t serve us at all. What matters most is that these issues are debated openly, that censorship does not become the norm and that scientists feel they can voice their opinions without worrying about being disgraced.

Einstein quote Never Stop Questioning

Fox thinking

How well are you retaining your physical, emotional and physical health right now?

Are covid policies enabling you living your full and wondrous existence?

Why is there no public debate on the approach to dealing with the greatest issue we have seen in our lives?